Showing posts with label Amendment 4. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amendment 4. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Newspeak and the town commission

Size of Whitney Plaza expansion proposed by our commissioners

Newspeak is a fictional language in George Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. In it, it refers to the deliberately impoverished language promoted by government.

Today I met a Longboat resident who had recently met a Longboat commissioner at a social function. The resident related to me that he had asked the commissioner about his pro-development reputation. The commissioner replied to the resident that he, and the commission, were not pro-development. The commissioner told the resident they were instead only trying to restore what had previously existed on Longboat Key in terms of retail businesses and tourist accommodations. I am told the commissioner used the term "Keeping Longboat Longboat" to describe the massive revisions the commission is making to our zoning codes and comprehensive plan. To me this is Longboat Newspeak.

I want to examine changes to Longboat's building codes, density limits, building height limits and  sweeping alterations to the comprehensive plan being proposed by the current commission and town attorneys in light of their assertion of being preservationists and not developer-friendly government officials.

If the commissioners are really only trying to "restore" retail business and tourism to what previously existed, then logically the codes already exist for doing that, since the current rules and codes already allow what the commission contends are their only objectives.

The increases in height, building mass and population density to Whitney Plaza being proposed by the current commission can be viewed as little else but opening the developer flood gates on the north end of the island. Why increase the height from 5 stories to 6 stories? Why increase the density if only businesses are to be allowed at that location? Surely there must be logical explanations for such detailed increases to the bulk and density of the current 1 story shopping center. A retail center that has been only partially occupied for over 2 decades. Obviously there has been little to no demand for commercial space on the north end of the island for quite some time. And no wonder since there is 3 times more commercial real estate on Longboat than is required to support our decreasing population. One wonders what the commissioners have in mind.

And where will all the tourists stay? The commissioners assure us we need many more tourists in order to eventually sell units at the Key Club. If you were going to recommend accommodations for visiting friends, where would you direct them? Now imagine where additional tourist motels and hotels can be built on this island. Would you recommend a new hotel at Whitney Plaza, where the public beach is a long hot walk across a busy highway, or a toes-in-the-sand waterfront lodging? Which would offer the better "island experience"?

Why is the commission working so hard to vastly increase the building bulk at Whitney Plaza? What do they think will be built there that requires exactly 1 extra story and a much larger footprint? I doubt any hotel located off the beach could compete with existing waterfront lodging on Longboat or adjacent islands.

I am worried that for all their supposed good intentions for all of us, that the commission makes our exclusive community vulnerable to profit-driven developers by destroying the well-crafted codes and comprehensive plan that have made Longboat one of the premier residential retirement communities in this country.

You might ask a commissioner why they want to expand Whitney Plaza far beyond what is fitting for the ambiance of the north end. The commissioners have never asked the residents of this island if they are happy with the way things are in terms of retail, and if they are willing to have more tourists and traffic congestion to have more stores that will have to cater to tourists to survive. Tourism stores are not the same stores that are frequented by residents. Maybe the commissioners should ask themselves why in the past it made sense for so many motel / hotel owners to sell to condominium developers?

Current Whitney Plaza

Longboat Key does need to change with the times. We need to open up our social structure. We need to find ways to provide better access to our beaches so that new home buyers will be attracted to neighborhoods east of GMD. We need to have the town actively participate in rejuvenating our community activities and make better use of our parks and recreation areas. We do not need inappropriate development where none is needed. Most of all, we need to start acting like a community instead of snowbird heaven. People need to wake up and see that beautiful Longboat may be under siege by developers and that our current commission is the best thing that ever happened for them. We do not want to become a poster child for the now defeated Amendment #4 - Home Town Democracy.

Even though the above mentioned commissioner calls himself, as well as his fellow commissioners, preservationists, I do not believe that dumbing-down the conversation to the point where "keeping Longboat Longboat" includes large scale high-rise development on the north end is anything less than Longboat Newspeak.

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Amendment 4 - Vote Yes


Amendment 4, called Hometown Democracy, empowers voters to control growth and abuses by developers within their own communities.


Amendment 4 is the result of too many developers being able to control local town governments in Florida by buying elections of local officials.


The state of Florida has some of the most lax development laws in America.


Why should Longboaters care about Amendment 4 on the November ballot?


To begin with we are currently paying the price for over-development in the Florida market as is reflected in  the selling price of our homes.


In a world of supply and demand, Florida is experiencing the consequences of unbridled development and too many houses on the market. Other parts of the country are not experiencing devastating property value declines; communities that have regulated growth for the benefit of their residents.


Amendment 4 simply says that the people of a community, not three of four commissioners who are in office because a developer spent a lot of money to elect them, should be able to decide whether a development, that requires changes in land use, should be allowed in their community.


Of course developers, builders, chambers of commerce and the real estate community are against Amendment 4. None of these people usually reside in the community they want to develop for profit.


Ask yourself if the above interested parties would object to Amendment 4 if no one made money building developments.


Amendment 4 is vital if we are to control tourism and tall structures on our island.


One need look no further than the tragedy that has destroyed Panama City Beach. A very few years ago PCB resembled our own low-density residential/tourism mix community. Then the developers were able to influence local elections, A group of pro-developer officials were elected. Now Panama City Beach is little more than seven miles of shoulder-to-shoulder 22 story condo-tels that are vacant and bankrupt. Buss-loads of college-age revelers are brought in on weekends to have a good time and help pay the bills.


If you do not believe that the same could happen here - think again - it can.


As I write this article several commissioners are hard at work rewriting our land use codes and Comprehensive Plan to make our community more inviting for developers.


Do you want to live in a community where tourism controls our economy?

Do you want to see buss-loads of young people using Longboat Key for their parties?


Do you want traffic grid-lock every time you leave your home?


If you would not want to buy a home in a tourist town then you may want to vote for Amendment 4 to protect the value of your property.


There are a few myths being promoted by the developers and real estate community.


Myth 1: Amendment 4 will require many expensive elections
Fact:    Votes are held at normally scheduled election time.


Myth 2: Amendment 4 will cause many changes to our Comprehensive Plan.
Fact:    Longboat seldom addresses lands use changes.


Myth 3: Voters will not be able to understand proposed land use changes on the ballot.
Fact:    Proposed changes must be clearly described in 75 words or fewer.

Myth 4: New residential developments bring in more tax revenues.
Fact:    It costs the counties $1.30 to pay for each $1.00 received from new development.

Remember that 80% of your taxes are collected by the county. Longboat taxpayers are subsidizing developers in Manatee and Sarasota counties which includes development within our community.

Link to Amendment 4 - Yes web site. http://floridahometowndemocracy.com/

Please be well informed when you vote. It's your wallet.